Makna Kepemimpinan Adaptif dalam Organisasi Modern: Studi Fenomenologi terhadap Transformasi Budaya Kerja di Era Disrupsi

Authors

  • Agus Salen Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Romansyah Sahabuddin Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Chalid Imran Musa Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Thamrin Tahir Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Agung Widhi Kurniawan Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/prosemnasimkb.v2i2.306

Keywords:

Adaptive Leadership, Disruptive Era, Organizational Culture, Phenomenology, Social Constructivism

Abstract

This study aims to understand the meaning of adaptive leadership in modern organizations facing transformations in work culture during the era of disruption. Using a phenomenological qualitative approach within the social constructivist paradigm, this research explores the lived experiences of leaders in interpreting change, uncertainty, and human values amid digitalization and organizational complexity. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and non-participant observation involving eight leaders from various industrial sectors in Indonesia and were analyzed using Colaizzi’s phenomenological analysis technique. The findings reveal that adaptive leadership is understood as a reflective and social process rooted in value awareness, empathy, and collective learning capacity. Adaptive leaders not only direct change but also facilitate learning and build trust through open communication and collaborative work cultures. Adaptive values such as flexibility, empathy, and moral reflection are key to shaping inclusive and sustainable organizational cultural transformation. Theoretically, this study extends the discourse on adaptive leadership within phenomenological and social contexts, while practically emphasizing the importance of value-based reflective leadership in navigating disruptive change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, C. A. (2020). Sustainability reporting and value creation. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(5), 889–907. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2020-0329

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715421

Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Deloitte Insights. (2023). Global human capital trends: Navigating the future of work in the age of AI. Deloitte University Press.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Edmondson, A. (2019). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley.

Gallup. (2022). State of the global workplace report 2022: The voice of the world’s employees. Gallup Press.

Goleman, D. (2013). The focused leader. Harvard Business Review, 91(12), 50–60.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Harvard University Press.

Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

McKinsey & Company. (2022). The state of organizations 2022: Ten shifts transforming the workplace. McKinsey Global Institute.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.

Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications.

Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Wiley.

Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.003

Uhl-Bien, M., & Marion, R. (2009). Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: A meso model. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 631–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.007

World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. WEF.

Yukl, G. A., & Gardner, W. L. (2020). Leadership in organizations (9th ed.). Pearson Education.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Agus Salen, Romansyah Sahabuddin, Chalid Imran Musa, Thamrin Tahir, & Agung Widhi Kurniawan. (2025). Makna Kepemimpinan Adaptif dalam Organisasi Modern: Studi Fenomenologi terhadap Transformasi Budaya Kerja di Era Disrupsi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Manajemen Kewirausahaan Dan Bisnis, 2(2), 751–764. https://doi.org/10.61132/prosemnasimkb.v2i2.306

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.